Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17676 (JHR)

CHANDU KUMAR JHA ALIAS CHANDU JHA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5629/2026 · 2026-06-23

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:18381] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5629 of 2026 ------ Chandu Kumar Jha @ Chandu Jha, aged about 24 years, S/O- Santosh Kumar Jha, R/O- E-101, Green Enclave, G.P. Shop, Kadma, P.O. & P.S.- Kadma, Town- Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate For the State : Mr. Tarun Kumar, Addl.P.P. For the Informant : Mrs. Seema Kumari Singh, Advocate ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-23-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No. 148 of 2026 arising out of Kadma P.S. Case No. 125 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 306, 34 of the IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner had abetted the commission of suicide of his brother in law namely Dinesh Kumar Jha. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case only because the sister of the petitioner is the step-mother of the informant. It is further submitted that as mentioned in par-29 of the case diary, the Call Detail Reports suggests that the petitioner was not near the place of occurrence of commission of suicide of the deceased. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 05.02.2026 as is evident from para-21 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the informant oppose the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, East Singhbhum at Jamshedpur in connection with S.T. Case No. 148 of 2026 arising out of Kadma P.S. Case No. 125 of 2022 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 23.06.2026 Saroj/