Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17674 (DEL)

GIRISH SHAHANI v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS.

W.P.(C)/12960/2026 · 2026-09-07

Amit Bansal

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(C) 12960/2026 $~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010420232026 + W.P.(C) 12960/2026 & CM APPL. 60250/2026 GIRISH SHAHANI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Seemlata, Advocate. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Umakant Mishra, Standing Counsel with Mr. Aadhar Nautiyal and Mr. Dipansh Mishra, Advocates for R-1 & 2/MCD (Through VC) Mr. Shubham Singh, Advocate for R- 3 (Through VC) Mr. Raghvendra Shukla, SPC with Mr. Nring Chamwibo Zeliang, GP Mr. Manu Shukla and Mr. Asra Chandra, Advocates for R-4 (Through VC) SI Anil, PS: Seemapuri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 07.09.2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to respondent-MCD to take action in accordance with law against the unauthorized construction being raised by respondent no.3 upon common terrace of the property bearing no. 262-D, J & K Pocket, Dilshad Garden, Delhi-110095 (‘subject property’). 2. Photographs have been filed along with the petition to highlight the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/09/2026 at 11:37:31 W.P.(C) 12960/2026 construction being carried out. 3. Counsel appears on behalf of the respondent-MCD on advance notice and submits that a show-cause notice has been issued to respondent no.3 regarding unauthorized construction. 3.1 He further submits that a work-stop notice has also been issued to the respondent no.4/SHO, P.S. Seemapuri to ensure that no authorized construction is carried out in the subject property. 4. Taking note of the aforesaid submissions, the present writ petition is disposed of while directing the respondent-MCD to take immediate action in accordance with law. 5. A direction is issued to the respondent no.4/SHO, P.S. Seemapuri to ensure that no construction is being carried out in the subject property. 6. In the event, the petitioner has any further grievance with regard to unauthorised construction, he is at liberty to take appropriate remedies in accordance with law. 7. All rights, contentions and legal remedies of the owner/occupier/ private respondent no.3 shall remain protected. 8. Pending application stands disposed of. AMIT BANSAL, J SEPTEMBER 7, 2026 Rzu This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/09/2026 at 11:37:31