Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1767 (RAJ)

PRABHUDAYAL S/O SHIMBHURAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3400/2026 · 2026-03-23

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:12053] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3400/2026 Prabhudayal S/o Shimbhuram, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Ward No. 3 Firojpur Jhirka, Police Station Firojpur Jhikra, District Nuh, Haryana. (Presently Confined In District Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nikhil Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, AGA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 23/03/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.316/2025 registered at Police Station Pahari, District Deeg for offences under Sections 318(4), 316(2) and 61(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the present petitioner is that he had purchased the mustard from the complainant for a consideration of Rs.12,98,000/-, but he failed to make the payment to the complainant even on the due date. Therefore, he intentionally defaulted on that account. From the FIR itself, it appears that the dispute is civil in nature rather than criminal. Petitioner is behind [2026:RJ-JP:12053] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3400/2026] the bars since 29.01.2026 with one criminal antecedent. Charge- sheet has been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Prabhudayal S/o Shimbhuram, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/67