Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17667 (JHR)

KAMLESH KUMAR @ KAMLESH BHUIYAN v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./714/2026 · 2026-06-23

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:18363 ) 1 Cr. M.P. No.714 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.714 of 2026 ------ 1. Kamlesh Kumar @ Kamlesh Bhuiyan, aged about 46 years, son of Ram Kumar Ram, 2. Pramod Ram @ Pramod Bhuiyan, aged about 44 years, son of Radheshyam Ram, 3. Vijay Ram @ Vijay Bhuiyan, aged about 52 years, son of Radheshyam Ram, 4. Shiv Ram @ Shiv Bhuiyan, aged about 60 years, son of Sita Ram, 5. Suresh Ram @ Suresh Bhuiyan, aged about 67 years, son of Late Maheshwar Ram, 6. Janeshwar Ram @ Janeshwar Bhuiyan, aged about 50 years, son of Ramswaroop Ram, 7. Kuldeep Ram @ Kuldip Bhuiyan, aged about 48 years, son of Raj Kumar Ram, All residents of Village Korga, P.O. Marwaniya, P.S.-Ramna, District-Garhwa, (Jharkhand). … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Pandey 2, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mishra, Addl.P.P. ------ P R E S E N T HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY I.A. No.7737 of 2026 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that this interlocutory application has been filed with the prayer for early hearing of the instant Cr.M.P. ( 2026:JHHC:18363 ) 2 Cr. M.P. No.714 of 2026 Since, the hearing of instant Cr.M.P. is taken up today, hence, this interlocutory application stands disposed of being infructuous. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Cr.M.P. No.714 of 2026 By the Court:- Heard the parties. 2. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 with several prayers. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners drawing attention of this Court to the Supplementary Affidavit dated 02.04.2026 submits that vide Miscellaneous Order no.202 of 2023, the learned Principal District Judge, Garhwa has directed for transfer of the G.R. Case No.333 of 2013 to the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Nagar Untari and after receipt of the said record in the Court of Nagar Untari, first order sheet was drawn up on 02.04.2024, but the petitioners have not been received any summons after the case was received in the Court of Nagar Untari. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners next submitted that this is a old case and the petitioners undertake to appear in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Nagar Untari on or before 10.07.2026 and to pray for regular bail. 5. Considering the facts of the case and as no notice has been issued to the petitioners after the case was received in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Nagar Untari after it being transferred from the ( 2026:JHHC:18363 ) 3 Cr. M.P. No.714 of 2026 Court of learned SDJM, Garhwa, hence, the non-bailable warrant of arrest issued against the petitioners vide order dated 02.09.2025 is quashed and set aside. 6. The petitioners are directed to appear before the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Nagar Untari on or before 10.07.2026, failing which, the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Nagar Untari is directed to take all coercive steps for apprehension of the petitioners to face the trial. 7. In the result, this Cr.M.P., is allowed to the aforesaid extent only. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi Dated the 23rd of June, 2026 AFR/ Abhiraj Uploaded on 24/06/2026