1 APHC010091702020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 623/2020 Between: 1. MOHD AHMEDUNNISA, W/O LATE MOHD ABDUL BASID, AGED. 65 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE R/O. PASARLAPUDI VILLAGE AND POST, MAMIDIKUDURU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DIST, ANDHRA PRADESH. 533242 ...PETITIONER AND 1. MOHD KHASIM, S/O. LATE LALJAN, AGED ABOUT. 61 YEARS, OCC. DEFACTO HEREDITARY MUTAWALLI, OF DARGAH RESIDENT OF PASARLAPUDI VILLAGE AND POST, MAMIDIKUDURU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DIST, ANDHRA PRADESH. 533242 2. ABID ALI, S/O LATE AGHA JAKIR HUSSAIN, AGED ABOUT. 50 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. OPPOSITE SUNNI MASJ ID, MUSLIM STREET, NAGARAM VILLAGE AND POST MAMIDIKUDURU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DIST, ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 172/2020 Between: 1. ABID ALI, S/O. LATE AGHA JAKIR HUSSAIN, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC- BUSINCSS, R/O.OPP- SUNNI.MASJID, MUSLIM STREET, NAGARAM VILLAGE AND POST, MAMIDIKUDURU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. MOHD KHASIM ALI, S/O.LATE LALJAN, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC- DEFACTO HEREDITARY MUTAWALI OF DARGAH, R/O.PASARLAPUDI VILLAGE AND POST, MAMIDIKUDURU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT - 533 247 2. SMT MOHD AHMED UNNISA, W/O.LATE MOHD. ABDUL BASID, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC- HOUSEWIFE, R/O.PASARLAPUDI VILLAGE AND POST, MAMIDIKUDURU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT - 533 247 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to the orders passed in O.S. No. 2 of 2018 on the file of the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh State Waqf Tribunal, at Hyderabad dated. 26.11.2019 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A M QURESHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KALEPU YASHWANTH The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NOS: 623 of 2020 & 172 of 2020 COMMON ORDER: 1. The memo was placed on record on behalf of the learned counsel for the respondent No.1 contending interaila that respondent No.1 has expired. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant Civil Revision petition has no cause of action at present. So, he does not want to proceed further. It appears from the record, the suit pending before learned Andhra Pradesh State WAQF Tribunal at Hyderabad has already been dismissed for default by an Order dated 15.03.2024. 3. Considering the submission of the petitioner, the instant Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. In the result, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Dated:06.01.2026. SSA/CMK