[2026:JHHC:18335] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3280 of 2026 Badal Kumar, Aged about 27 years, S/o- Suraj Malkar @ Surajdeo Malkar, Resident of Village Barkatha, P.O. and P.S. Barkatha, District Hazaribagh. ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Lalan Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mrs. Kumari Rashmi, A.P.P. ------ 05/ 23.06.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Ormanjhi P.S. Case No. 06 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 109, 326(F), 308(4), 111(2), 111(3), 111(4), 111(5), 111(6), 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Section 27 of Arms Act and Section 17 of CLA Act, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate-XVI, Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the name of this petitioner has come on the basis of confessional statement. He next submits that the allegation of threatening and talking with one Vikrant Ji is not correct. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be provided to the petitioner. 4. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer and submits that the petitioner happened to be an associate of one Vikrant Ji, who is an area commander of Tritiya Sammelan Prastuti Committee (TSPC), which is the extremists organization. She next submits that the petitioner is having five criminal antecedents. On these grounds, she submits that [2026:JHHC:18335] -2- anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. In the FIR, allegations are there of demanding extortion after reaching the crusher plant of the informant and further the petitioner is said to be the associate of one Vikrant Ji, who is an area commander of Tritiya Sammelan Prastuti Committee (TSPC), which is the extremists organization and the petitioner is also having five criminal antecedents. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, above named. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-23.06.2026 Amitesh/-