Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17659 (AP)

SHAIK ABDUL AZIZ ( Died ) as per L.Rs P2 and P3 v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/4608/2023 · 2026-03-01

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010091002023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 4608/2023 Between: 1. SHAIK ABDUL AZIZ ( DIED ) AS PER L.RS P2 AND P3, S/O LATE SHAIK IMAM SAHEB, AGE 85 YRS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O D. NO. 5-26, MUSLIMPET, KALURU VILLAGE, PERUMALLAPALLI, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL. TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 2. SMOHAMMAD RAFI S/O LATE SHAIK ABDUL AZIZ, AGE 48 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O D.NO.5-26, MUSLIMPET, KALURU VILLAGE, PURUMALLAPALLI, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 3. S. ABDUL S/O LATE SHAIK ABDUL AZIZ,, AGE 44 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O D.NO.5-26, MUSLIMPET, KALURU VILLAGE, PERUMALLAPALLI, TIRUPATHI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. PETITIONER NOS. 2 AND 3 ARE BROUGHT ON RECORD AS L.RS OF THE DECEASED SOLE WRIT PETITIONER AS PER THE COURT'S ORDER DT.25.11.2025 IN I.A.NO.02 OF 2023. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATI 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, KALURU VILLAGE, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4. S SHARIFA BEE, W/O LATE RASOOL AGE. MAJOR, OCC. NOT KNOWN, 5. S MEHARAJ, D/O LATE RASULSAHEB, AGE. MAJOR, OCC. NOT KNOWN, 6. S LALSHA, S/O LATE RASULSAHAB AGE. MAJOR, OCC. NOT KNOWN, 7. S ZAKIR, S/O JANIBASHA, AGE. MAJOR, OCC. NOT KNOWN, 8. S BASHIR, S/O JANIBASHA AGE. MAJOR, OCC. NOT KNOWN, 9. S RAFI, S/O BUDASAHEB AGE. MAJOR, OCC. NOT KNOWN, 10. R BHARATHI, S/O K KUPPAIAH AGE. MAJOR, OCC. NOT KNOWN, 2 11. S MUNIRATHNAM, S/O VENKATAMUNI AGE. MAJOR, OCC. NOT KNOWN, THE RESPONDENT NOS. 4 TO 11 ARE R/O. MUSLIMPET, KALURU VILLAGE, TIRUPATHI RURAL, TIRUPATHI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ or order/s more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the in action of the respondent No.2 pursuant to the notice of the petitioner dt. 10-01-2023, as being illegal and arbitrary and violative of Article 300-A of Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of AP Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfer) Act, 1977 and consequently direct the respondent No.2 to forthwith resume and put the petitioner into possession of the land admeasuring Ac3.98 Cents in Sy. No. 45 of Kaluru village, Tirupathi Rural and be pleased to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent No.2 to take necessary action on the notice of the petitioner dt. 10-01-2023 and put the petitioner into possession of the land admeasuring Ac3.98 Cents in Sy. No. 45 of Kaluru village, Tirupathi Rural and be pleased to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to bring the petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 on record as the legal heirs of sole petitioner namely; Shaik Abdul Aziz and permit the proposed petitioners to pursue the WP No. 4608 of 2023 and be pleased to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V VENKATA MAYUR 2. SHAIK ABDUL AZIZ (Petitioner) Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. SRINIVASULU KURRA The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.4608 of 2023 ORDER: Despite the writ petition being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioners. Hence, it indicates that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 02.03.2026 KBN 4 13 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 4608 of 2023 Date: 02.03.2026 KBN