1 2026:CGHC:10293 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2136 of 2026 1. Narendra Kumar Soni S/o Late Shri Tikaram Soni Aged About 52 Years R/o Village And Post- Silyari, P.S. Dharseeva, Tahsil And Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home/ Police, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, P.S. And Post- Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2. Additional Director General Of Police (Adgp) Administration Office Of Adgp (Administration), Police Head- Quarter (Phq), Sector- 19, P.S. And Post- Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3. Additional Director General Of Police (Adgp) Training Office Of Adgp (Training), Police Headquarter (Phq), Sector- 19, P.S. And Post- Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 4. Superintendent Of Police (S.P.) Office Of S.P. Police Training School (P.T.S.), Rajnandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 5. Superintendent Of Police (S.P.) Office Of S.P., Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 6. Reserve Inspector Office Of Reserve Inspector, Police Line, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Digitally signed by SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Date: 2026.02.27 18:07:15 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Pandey, Advocate with Ms. Varsha Sharma, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Vivek Verma, Govt. Advocate SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order on Board 27/02/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1. That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to permit the petitioner to prefer representation before the Respondent No.2 ADGP, Administration, raipur and also before Respondent No.3 ADGP, Training, Raipur the basic training of 9 months should be exempted and only 3 months of basic training of petitioner should be conducted. 10.2. That this Hon’ble Court may further be pleased to grant any other relief, which is deemed to be fit by this Hon’ble Court.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that at this stage petitioner is not pressing this petition on merits and only seeking permission of this Court to submit a comprehensive representation before respondent No.2 and 3 for redressal of his grievance as raised in this writ petition, and in turn, a direction be issued to respondents No.2 and 3 to consider and decide representation to be submitted by petitioner expeditiously within specified time frame. 3. Learned counsel for respondent-State would submit that in view of limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner 3 seeking permission to submit representation before respondent No.2 and 3, he is having no objection. 4. Heard learned counsel for parties and perused documents available in record of writ petition. 5. On due consideration of submission of learned counsel for respective parties, without commenting anything on merits of case of petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of at this stage permitting petitioner to submit representation before respondent No.2 and 3 for redressal of his grievance raising all the grounds as pleaded in this writ petition. If petitioner submits representation before respondent No.2 and 3, the same shall be considered and decided by them in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of representation. 6. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge roshan/-