1 of 2 940-CA.8745.2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 940 FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO.6856 OF 2013 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8745 OF 2013 IN FAST/6856/2013 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VERSUS VITTHAL SONA NARHE ... Mr. D. R. Korde, AGP for the Appellant/State. … AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8746 OF 2013 IN FAST/6856/2013 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VERSUS VITTHAL SONA NARHE … Mr. D. R. Korde, AGP for the Appellant/State. ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 1st OCTOBER, 2026 P.C.:- CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8745 OF 2013:- 1. By this application, the Applicant is seeks condonation of delay in filing first appeal. 2. Considering the averments made in the application, delay is condone. Accordingly, the application is allowed. FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO.6856 OF 2013:- 3. Since the acquisition proceedings pertain to the year 1993, 2026:BHC-AUG:47349 2 of 2 940-CA.8745.2013 the appeal is heard finally with the consent of the learned Advocates for the respective parties. 4. By this appeal, the Appellants are aggrieved by the Judgment and award dated 20.07.2009 passed by the learned Civil Judge Senior Division at Shrigonda, District Ahmednagar in L.A.R. No.113/1998. 5. Mr. D. R. Korde, learned AGP for the Appellant/State submits that the compensation enhanced by the learned Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the SLAO. 6. In fact the State Government vide Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times. 7. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned orders. Hence, the present Appeal is dismissed. 8. In view of dismissal of the Appeal, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly. (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.) Tauseef