YELLAMILLI CHANDRIKA KAMALAVARSHINI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/5254/2026 · 2026-03-02
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17643 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17643 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010091692026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 5254/2026 Between:
YELLAMILLI CHANDRIKA KAMALAVARSHINI, W/O RAVITEJA, AGED 30 YEARS, RESIDENT OF CHINAPETA VILLAGE, VEERAVASARAM MANDAL, W.G. DISTRICT-534245
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BHIMAVARAM, W.G. DISTRICT -
534201. 3. DY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NARASAPURAM, W. G.
DISTRICT -534275. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BHIMAVARAM RURAL CIRCLE STATION, BHIMAVARAM, W.G. DISTRICT-534201. 5. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VEERAVASARAM POLICE STATION, W.G. DISTRICT-534245. 6. YELLAMILLI RAVITEJA, S/O ANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D.NO.7-7-13/1, NARASAYYAGRAHARAM, CHURCH ROAD, BHIMAVARAM, W.G. DISTRICT-534201. 7. PEETHALA BABY JANSY KAMALA KUMARI, HUSBAND'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
2 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.5254 of 2026 Dated 03.03.2026
RESIDENT OF NARASAYYAGRAHARAM, CHURCH ROAD, BHIMAVARAM, W.G. DISTRICT-534201. 8. YELLAMILLI SHYAMALA RANI, W/O ANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D.NO.7-7-13/1, NARASAYYAGRAHARAM, CHURCH ROAD, BHIMAVARAM, W.G.
DISTRICT-534201. 9. SAKA ANEESHA, W/O ANIL KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RESIDENT OF NARASAYYAGRAHARAM, CHURCH ROAD, BHIMAVARAM, W.G. DISTRICT-534201. 10. SABBITHI PRATHYUSHA, D/O ANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D.NO.7-7-13/1, NARASAYYAGRAHARA M, CHURCH ROAD, BHIMAVARAM, W.G. DISTRICT-534201. 11. GUMPULA CHANDRASEKHAR, HIS FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, RESIDENT OF NARASAYYAGRAHARAM, CHURCH ROAD, BHIMAVARAM, W.G. DISTRICT-534201. 12. YELLAMILLI ANJANEYULU, HIS FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D.NO.7-7-13/1, NARASAYYAGRAHARAM,
CHURCH ROAD, BHIMAVARAM, W.G. DISTRICT-534201. 13. GUMPULA MANJUSHA, W/O CHANDRASEKHAR, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, RESIDENT OF NARASAYYAGRAHARAM, CHURCH ROAD, BHIMAVARAM, W.G. DISTRICT-534201. 14. SAAKA ANIL KUMAR, HIS FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
RESIDENT OF NARASAYYAGRAHARAM, CHURCH ROAD, BHIMAVARAM, W.G.
DISTRICT-534201. 15. SAAKA BHUSHANAM, HIS FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
RESIDENT OF NARASAYYAGRAHARAM, CHURCH ROAD, BHIMAVARAM, W.G.
DISTRICT-534201. ...RESPONDENT(S):
3 Dr.
YLR, J W.P.No.5254 of 2026 Dated 03.03.2026
Counsel for the Petitioner:
GOWRI SANKAR CHEEKATLA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- <…to issue any writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents 2 to 5 especially respondent No 5 in not taking any action against the respondents 6 to 15 on the report/complaint dt 16 2 2026 given by me as illegal arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 and also violation of principles of natural justice and also violation of Article 14 19 and Art 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the Respondent No 5 to register the FIR basing on the report/complaint of the petitioner dt 16 2 2026 and take appropriate action against the respondents 6 to 15 in accordance with law and to pass….=
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. Mr. Cheekatla Gowri Shankar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that respondent Nos.2 to 5, particularly respondent No.5, have not taken any action against respondent Nos.6 to 15 on the complaint dated 16.02.2026 submitted by the petitioner. 4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that the petitioner lodged a complaint before respondent No.5 on
16.02.2026. Based on the said complaint, a preliminary enquiry was
4 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.5254 of 2026 Dated 03.03.2026
conducted, during which it was revealed that matrimonial disputes are pending between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. After counseling both parties and based on the contents of the complaint, a case in Crime No.40 of 2026 was registered against respondent Nos.6 to 15, and the investigation has been taken up. 5.
In view of the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader and considering that the petitioner’s complaint has already been registered as Crime No.40 of 2026 and investigation is in progress, no further direction is required in the matter. It is open to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedies in accordance with law, if so advised, after filing of relevant report by the Investigating Officer. 6. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 03.03.2026 RSI
5 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.5254 of 2026 Dated 03.03.2026
73 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 5254 of 2026
Date: 03.03.2026 RSI