Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1764 (JHR)

VIJAY MAHTO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./430/2026 · 2026-02-25

Rajesh Kumar

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:5504 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.430 of 2026 1. Vijay Mahto, aged about 38 years; 2. Rajendra Mahto, aged about 46 years; Both sons of Lukhi Kapari @ Lakhi Mahto, Resident of Village Jaratikar, P.O. and P.S. Jarmundi, District Dumka. … …Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand … …Opp. Party(s) --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR --- For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) : Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr., Adv. For the State : Ms. V. Bharti, A.P.P. --- 02/25.02.2026: After some arguments, learned senior counsel for the applicant(s) seeks permission to withdraw this bail application with a liberty to file separate bail application with better particular, especially, in view of the order dated 11.02.2026 passed by the Apex Court in Criminal Appeal No.825 of 2026 [arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.12669 of 2025] reported in 2026 SCC OnLine SC 188. Permission is granted. This bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Counsel for applicant(s) is also at liberty to utilize certified copy of the impugned order as well as other relevant documents. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) February 25th, 2026 Ravi-Chandan/- Uploaded