AMANDEEP SINGH & ORS. v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
CRL.M.C./5204/2026 · 2026-09-09
Girish Kathpalia
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17635 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17635 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL.M.C. 5204/2026
Page 1 of 2 pages $~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI %
Date of Decision: 09.09.2026
# CNR No. DLHC010327712026 + CRL.M.C. 5204/2026
AMANDEEP SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Gauri Batra, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for the State with SI Manju Mr. Jagmohan Singh, Advocate for R-2 (through videoconferencing) with R-2 in person. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 195/2022 of Police Station Moti Nagar for offence under Section 498A/406/509/34 IPC on the basis of mediation settlement dated 21.07.2025 between the petitioners and respondent no. 2 recorded at Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45 569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557 0996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.09.09 17:22:41 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:09.09.2026 17:22:24 Signature Not Verified
CRL.M.C. 5204/2026
Page 2 of 2 pages
2. State has no objection to this petition. Statements of parties have already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar. 3. The respondent no.2 is present in court today and is identified by the IO SI Manju. I have spoken with respondent no.2 in Hindi and it is stated by her that she has compromised all disputes with the petitioners. Marriage between petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 stands already dissolved by way of decree of divorce. One girl child was born from wedlock of petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 and she is in the custody of respondent no. 2. The respondent no.2 submits that she has received complete full and final settlement amount in lieu of her entire stridhan and maintenance. Respondent no.2 submits that she does not wish to continue prosecution of petitioners. 4. Having spoken with respondent no.2, I am satisfied that it would be in the interest of justice not to push the parties through full dress trial. 5. Therefore, the petition is allowed and FIR No. 195/2022 of Police Station Moti Nagar for offence under Section 498A/406/509/34 IPC as well as proceedings arising out of the same are quashed.
GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) SEPTEMBER 09, 2026/rs GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec 45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1 5570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff80 1e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.09.09 17:22:29 +05'30' By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:09.09.2026 17:22:24