Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17626 (DEL)

SHASHI BHATIA v. MANOHAR LAL

RC.REV./30/2026 · 2026-09-07

Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC011093532025 + RC.REV. 30/2026 SHASHI BHATIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Hemant Manjani, Mr. Uday Mathur and Ms. Khushi Raj, Advs. versus MANOHAR LAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Udit Gupta, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR O R D E R % 07.09.2026 CM APPL.60169/2026 (Recall of order dt. 14.07.2026) 1. The present Application, under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the Respondent/ Applicant seeks recall of the Order dated 14.07.2026, to limited extent that the expression “Respondent” appearing in paras 2, 4 and 5 be read as “Petitioner/Tenant”. 2. It is submitted that the same is erroneous since the documents had, in fact, been filed and brought on record much prior thereto. Therefore, there is no delay in filing the documents and placing the same on record. 3. A perusal of the Office Noting; however, indicates that the Lease Deeds/documents which the Respondent sought to bring on record, though were filed as early as on 20.03.2026, the same were under objections. This led to this Court passing the Order dated This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/09/2026 at 11:20:38 14.07.2026. 4. Learned counsel for the Non-Applicant/Petitioner would endorse the aforenoted observation of the Court. 5. This Court is of the considered view that no steps were taken in a timely manner for bringing the documents on record. This Court does not find any error in the Order dated 14.07.2026. 6. Accordingly, the present Application is dismissed and disposed of. 7. The Applicant is directed to pay the costs imposed vide Order dated 14.07.2026 within a period of one (01) week from today. RC.REV. 30/2026, CM APPL. 5958/2026 (Stay), CM APPL. 5959/2026 (Ex. From filing certified copy of the Trial court record), CM APPL. 5960/2026 (Ex.) & CM APPL. 5961/2026 (Delay of 38 days in Re-filing the petition) 8. The present Rent Control Revision Petition, filed under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, challenges the Order dated 09.06.2025 passed by the learned Additional Rent Controller- 01, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, in Eviction Petition being RC ARC No.315/2023, whereby the Application seeking leave to defend filed by the Petitioner herein was dismissed and an Eviction Order came to be passed. 9. This Court takes note that vide Order dated 18.02.2026, learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, had submitted that the Petitioner shall vacate the subject premises within a period of one (01) year from 18.02.2026, subject to deposit of the use and occupation charges. 10. Learned counsel for the parties, on instructions, submit that the parties agree that the user and occupation charges be fixed at This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/09/2026 at 11:20:38 Rs.22,500/- per month, which shall be paid by the Petitioner on or before the 7th day of every English calendar month and shall be payable from 09.12.2025 until the date of vacation of the premises. 11. The Petitioner shall file an Affidavit of Undertaking to this effect, setting out therein the date by which the Petitioner shall vacate the premises and the user and occupation charges payable till such time, within a period of three (03) weeks from. 12. Let the needful be done within a period of three (03) weeks from today, failing which the Petitioner shall be liable to vacate the subject premises forthwith and the Respondent shall be at liberty to take steps available under law, inter alia, initiation of contempt proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. 13. Accordingly, this Court is of the considered view that no further orders are required to be passed in the present matter. 14. In the aforesaid terms, the present Petition, along with pending application(s), stands disposed of. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. SEPTEMBER 07, 2026/rk/va This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/09/2026 at 11:20:38