Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17622 (AP)

KODIDALA SATYANARAYANA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/5265/2026 · 2026-03-02

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010091672026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 5265/2026 Between: 1. KODIDALA SATYANARAYANA, S/O SURYANARAYANA, AGE 48 YEARS, MALE, BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. 198-3A/4, JITENDRA NILAYAM, TETALI-534218, TANUKU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. KODIDALA NARSA BHAVANI,, W/O SATYANARAYANA, AGE 44 YEARS. FEMALE, BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. 198-3A/4, JITENDRA NILAYAM, TETALI-534218, TANUKU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT AT VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522238. 2. THE SUPERINDENT OF POLICE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT BHIMAVARAM-534201. 3. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, , PALAKOL TOWN POLICE STATION, PALAKOL -534260 WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 4. YERRAMSETTI PADMA RAO, S/O SURYANARAYANA, AGE 57 YEARS, MALE, COCONUT-BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. 4-181, VEDANGI -534265, PODURU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. MAMIDISETTI SRINIVASU, S/O SIVANNARAYANA, AGE 33 YEARS, MALE, BUSINESS R/O PALAKODERU-534210, PALAKODERU 2 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.5265 of 2026 Dated 03.03.2026 MANDAT, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. MAMIDI BABU, S/O VENKATA RAO, AGE 55 YEARS, MALE, BUSINESS R/O NEAR JAGGAYAMMA SATRAM, PALAKOL-534260, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. GUDIMETLA VENU GOPALA JAGGA RAO, S/O KRISHNA RAO, AGE 60 YEARS, MALE, BUSINESS, SHAVUKARU PET, R/O PALAKOL- 534260, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 8. MAJETI KUMARI LAKSHMI ANDALLU, W/O SAI MURALI, AGE 59 YEARS. FEMALE, R/O ELURU-534001,WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 9. GUDIMETLA SUNITHA, W/O RAMA KRISHNA, AGE 50 YEARS. FEMALE R/O PALAKOL -534260 WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): KOTHA NAGA SURYA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- <…to issue an order or direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India declaring the inaction of Respondents 2 and 3 in not providing police protection to the petitioners life and property ignoring their registered representation Dt 17122025 as illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional and Direct Respondents 2 and 3 to provide immediate effective and continuous police protection to the petitioners and their property situated at Shavukaru Peta Palakol Town consequentely Restrain Respondents 4 to 9 their associates and men from interfering with the petitioners peaceful possession except by due process of law and pass….= 3 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.5265 of 2026 Dated 03.03.2026 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. Sri Kotha Naga Suryarao, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are not providing police protection to the petitioners’ life and property, ignoring their registered representation dated 17.12.2025. 4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that Respondent No.3 has received a PGRS petition filed by Respondent Nos.7 to 9, who are the joint property holders. Based on the said PGRS petition, after conducting a preliminary enquiry, it was revealed that there is a civil issue relating to the registration of documents, and the petition was closed accordingly. It is further submitted that a civil dispute is pending between the petitioners and Respondent Nos.7 to 9 in O.S.No.52 of 2025, dated 27.11.2026, on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Narasapuram. The petitioners have also filed W.P.No.27375 of 2025 before this Court and, as per the orders dated 09.10.2025, Respondent No.3 has not involved himself in any of the issues. 5. In view of the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing Respondent Nos.2 and 3 to consider the representation dated 17.12.2025 submitted by the petitioners in accordance with law within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. 4 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.5265 of 2026 Dated 03.03.2026 6. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 03.03.2026 RSI 5 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.5265 of 2026 Dated 03.03.2026 116 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 5265 of 2026 Date: 03.03.2026 RSI