19 WP-9430-26.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9430 OF 2026 Daljeet Singh Matharu & ors. ..Petitioners Versus Paramjeet Kaur Matharu & anr. …Respondents Mr. Rahul Singh a/w Ms. Pranali Raut i/b Legal Catalyst, for the Petitioners. CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : 31st July 2026 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners. 2. The challenge in this petition is to an order dated 13th March, 2026 whereby the learned Civil Judge declined to exhibit a document i.e. sub lease dated 02nd October 1982 (Document No.1 below Exh. 95). 3. Mr. Singh, the learned Counsel for the petitioners, submitted that the petitioners could have been permitted to tender the said document in evidence, and its evidentiary value could be considered at a later stage. 4. The learned Judge is justiAed in holding that since the document is not proved in evidence, the same cannot be marked. If the petitioners intend to prove the said document, SAINATH, PA 1/2 SAINATH SANJAY BODKHE Digitally signed by SAINATH SANJAY BODKHE Date: 2026.08.01 10:57:22 +0530 19 WP-9430-26.DOC the petitioners are at liberty to adduce the evidence as permissible in law. 5. Subject to the aforesaid clariAcation, the Writ Petition stands disposed. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] SAINATH, PA 2/2