HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 6374 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Vashishtha Tiwari, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Santosh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for State-Respondents and Sri Rohit Pandey, Advocate for Respondents-1 and 2. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner, on instruction, submits that during pendency of this writ petition petitioner’s grievance has already been substantially addressed, therefore, this writ petition may be disposed of. 3. Learned counsel for respondents have acknowledged the aforesaid fact. 4. Considering above submissions and subsequent event, this writ petition is disposed of. May 7, 2026 AK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vashishtha Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rohit Pandey (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Prof Dr Indu Sharma .....Petitioner(s) Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Mjp Rohilkhand University Bareilly And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad