Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9489 WP No. 3595 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3595 OF 2026 (S-RES) BETWEEN:
MR.DILEEP KUMAR K.S., S/O LATE SHIVAMADAIAH AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/O KEMPEGOWDANADODDI VILLAGE HONNAGANAHALLI POST SATANUR HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT – 562126 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ABHIJITH KS., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU – 560001.
2.
THE COMMISSIONER SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001.
3.
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562159 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. ANITHA N, AGA FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT,
ORDER OR DIRECTION, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER AND DISPOSE OF THE PETITIONERS
Digitally signed by MALATHI CHALUVA IYENGAR Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9489 WP No. 3595 of 2026
REPRESENTATION DATED 18.02.2025 (ANNEXURE-D) SEEKING COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW WITHIN AT TIME FRAME TO BE FIXED BY THIS HONBLE COURT and etc.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
1. Learned AGA is directed to accept notice for respondents-State.
2. At the outset, learned AGA raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that the petitioner is seeking appointment under the Karnataka Civil Services (Appointment of Family Members of Persons Belonging to Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes who die in Atrocities on SC/ST on Compassionate Grounds) (Special) Rules, 1999. Therefore, the petitioner has to approach the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal.
3. The grievance in respect of the ‘service matters’ cannot be a subject matter of adjudication at the hands of a writ Court, as the court of first instance, in the light of
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9489 WP No. 3595 of 2026
the decision of the Apex Court in the case of L.Chandra Kumar vs. Union of India and others reported in (1997) 3 SCC 261.
4. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of, reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate legal forum, if law permits.
5. Registry is directed to return the original or certified copies of the documents, if any, to the petitioner, after retaining the photocopies of the same for record purpose.
Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE
DM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 20