Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17618 (JHR)

SHAILU CHANDRAVANSHI ALIAS SHAILENDRA KUMAR ALIAS SHAILENDRA KUMAR SHAILU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5626/2026 · 2026-06-23

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(2026:JHHC:18333) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 5626 of 2026 Shailu Chandravanshi @ Shailendra Kumar Shailu @ Shailendra Kumar, aged about 45 years, s/o Gauri Shankar Chandravanshi, r/o at – Purab Mohalla, PO & PS – Chainpur, District – Palamau, Jharkhand. … … …Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … …Opp. Party ------ HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sheo Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Ms. Sushma Aind, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No:- 02, Dated:- 23rd June, 2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved before this Court for grant of bail in connection with Chainpur P.S. Case No. 79 of 2026, registered for the offences punishable under sections 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 126(2), 109, 351(2) and 352 of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has attempted to commit murder of Chandan Kumar by assaulting him. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and as per the opinion of the doctor, the injuries were simple in nature and the same was caused by a hard and blunt object as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 09 of this bail application. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has been in custody since 26.03.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 15 of the bail application. It is next submitted that although charge-sheet has been submitted yet no witnesses have been examined. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Palamau at Daltonganj, in connection with Chainpur P.S. Case No. 79 of 2026, with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated – 23.06.2026 Aditi