[2026:JHHC:18347] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5602 of 2026 ------ 1. Jagdish Bari, aged about 27 years, S/o Late Tilakdhari Bari, resident of Village- Indikuri, P.O. & P.S.- Jhinkpani, Dist.- West Singhbhum (Jharkhand) 2. Ghanshyam Boyap @ Ghanshyam Boipai, aged about 23 years, S/o Gala Boipai, resident of Village- Bara Bardadih, P.O. & P.S.- Manjhari, Dist.- West Singhbhum (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Anjani Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-23-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No.84 of 2026 arising out of Manjhari P.S. Case No.07 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 103 (1), 238 and 61 (2) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners, in criminal conspiracy with the co- accused persons, have committed the murder of Robin Boipai and caused disappearance of the evidence of the murder by throwing the dead body of the deceased by the side of the road. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para- 16 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that though the petitioners are not named in the F.I.R. yet they have been implicated in this case only on the basis of their self-confessional statement as well as the confessional statement of the co-accused persons and leading to discovery of the dead body of the deceased. It is also submitted that charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that except the confessional statement and suspicion, there is no other material in the record to implicate the petitioners in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertakes that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and that they will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 05.01.2026 as has been mentioned in para-18 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa in connection with S.T. Case No.84 of 2026 arising out of Manjhari P.S. Case No.07 of 2025 with the condition that they will co- operate with the trial of the case, furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-23.06.2026-Animesh/