Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17613 (JHR)

TABREJ ANSARI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5617/2026 · 2026-06-23

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(2026:JHHC:18256) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 5617 of 2026 Tabrej Ansari, aged about 32 years, s/o Jalil Ansari, r/o – NH33, Ansarnagar, Karma, PO – Irba, PS – Ormanjhi, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand. … … …Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … …Opp. Party ------ HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Pandey, Advocate : Mr. Dilip Kr. Saw, Advocate For the State : Mr. Gautam Rakesh, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No:- 04, Dated:- 23rd June, 2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved before this Court for grant of bail in connection with Chandil P.S. Case No. 58 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 293 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under sections 309(4) of the B.N.S. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed robbery and looted the Scorpio vehicle of the informant. It is next submitted that in the meanwhile, the informant has been examined in the Court but he did not identify the petitioner in Court and could only identify the co-accused who has since been admitted to bail by a co-ordinate bench of this Court during the summer vacation. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner was also not identified in the T.I. Parade. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 29.05.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 and 12 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Chandil, in connection with Chandil P.S. Case No. 58 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 293 of 2025, with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated – 23.06.2026 Aditi