APHC010088402026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 4999/2026 Between: 1. C MUNIRATNAM,, S/O LATE CHINNAYYA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/O BALIA VILLAGE, RAMAKUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 517401 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, AP 522238 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, 517001 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT,AP 517425 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAMAKUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 517405 5. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, RAAMAKUPPAM PS, CHITTOOR DISTRICT,517401 6. A NAZEER GAVARNOR, S/O KHASEEM SAHEBH BALIA VILLAGE POST, RAMAKUPPAM CHITTOOR AP 517401 7. NAVAZ, S/O A NAZEER @ GAVARNOR R/O BALIA VILLAGE POST, RAMAKUPPAM CHITTOOR DISTRICT, AP 517401 8. THANWEER, S/O A NAZEER @ GAVARNOR R/O BALIA VILLAGE POST, RAMAKUPPAM CHITTOOR 517401 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KODE RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed for the following relief: “…to issue a writ order or direction more particularly writ of mandamus declaring the action of Respondent no. 2 to 4 in not disposing of the application filed by the petitioner herein for taking action against the Respondent no. 6 to 8 for not allowing the Petitioners to enter into the land even though they are rightful owners of the property in relation to the land in Sy. No. 152/1 A, extent Ac. 0.70 cents , bearing Patta No. 134 situated at Balia, Raamakuppam, Madanapalli, Chittoor is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, and violative of articles 14, 21 and 300-A and consequently pleased to direct respondent No. 4 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26-01-2026…” 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. Mr. K. Ranga Srinivas, learned counsel appearing for Mr. K. Ramesh Babu, learned counsel for the Petitioner, submits that on 26.01.2026 the Petitioner submitted a representation to the Respondent Police seeking police aid to protect his chilli crop from the unofficial Respondents. 4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that no such representation was submitted by the Petitioner to the Police seeking protection. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the Petitioner to submit a fresh representation with due acknowledgment to Respondent Nos.4 and 5 within two weeks. Upon 3 receipt of such representation, Respondent Nos.4 and 5 shall consider and pass appropriate orders within three weeks thereafter, in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ Dr.Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dated: 05.03.2026 PRA 4 80 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 4999 of 2026 Date: 05.03.2026 PRA