Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17611 (JHR)

BABLOO GUPTA ALIAS UDAY PRASAD ALIAS BABLU GUPTA ALIAS UDAY PRASAD GUPTA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5640/2026 · 2026-06-23

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:18387] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5640 of 2026 ------ Babloo Gupta @ Uday Prasad @ Bablu Gupta @ Uday Prasad Gupta, aged about 44 years, son of Late Paras Nath Gupta, resident of Madhushala Road, Japla, P.O: Japla, P.S. Hussainabad, Dist: Palamau, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar, Sr. Advocate Mrs. Chandana Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl.P.P. ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-23-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Haidarnagar P.S. Case No.92 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)(B) and 25 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that principal accused of the case namely Guddu Kumar who was found in illegal possession of 3.270 kg of Ganja and in his confessional statement, disclosed that he has purchased the seized the Ganja from the petitioner. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner but no witness has been examined as yet. It is also submitted that the seized Ganja comes under intermediate quantity. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 12.02.2026 as is evident from para-6 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 09.04.2026 passed in B.A. No.2847 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, N.D.P.S. Act, Palamau in connection with Haidarnagar P.S. Case No.92 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Voter I.D. in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 23.06.2026 Saroj/