( 2026:JHHC:18310 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 3043 of 2026 Isha Kumari, aged about 18 years, daughter of Pramod Prasad, resident of Loco Bazar Pathardih, P.O.-Pathardih, P.S. Sudamadih, District-Dhanbad ...... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mrs. J. Mazumdar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Subodh Kr. Dubey, A.P.P. 02/ 23.06.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sudamadih P.S. Case No. 03 of 2025, registered under section 103(1) of BNS, 2023, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Dhanbad. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. She next submits that allegation is made that this petitioner and deceased were friends. She submits that in para 34 and 35 of the case diary who are witnesses and neighbour have stated that deceased never visited the house of this petitioner before the incident. She next submits that poison has not been seized by the I.O. but the same has been produced by the father of the deceased after three months of the alleged occurrence. She submits that witnesses in the seizure list are father and sister of the deceased. She further submits that alleged occurrence is dated 27.12.2024 and F.I.R has been lodged on 12.01.2025. She next submits that in page 17 of the case diary medical opinion of the doctor is there and doctor has clearly stated that there is no proof of poison. On these grounds, she submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. ( 2026:JHHC:18310 ) 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that allegations are there that after meeting with this petitioner the deceased was found not stable. 5. The poison was produced by the father of the deceased after three month of the occurrence and it was not seized by the I.O. In para 34 and 35 of the case diary who are witnesses and neighbour have stated that deceased never visited the house of this petitioner before the incident. The alleged occurrence is dated 27.12.2024 and F.I.R has been lodged on 12.01.2025. In page 17 of the case diary medical opinion of the doctor is there and doctor has clearly stated that there is no proof of poison. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the above named, petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of his surrender / arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Dhanbad, in connection with Sudamadih P.S. Case No. 03 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023. Dt.23.06.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-