Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17607 (DEL)

SARTHAK GUPTA v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

CRL.M.C./6136/2026 · 2026-09-07

Saurabh Banerjee

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010389262026 + CRL.M.C. 6136/2026, CRL.M.A. 25655-25656/2026 SARTHAK GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nishant Mandal, Ms. Sunita, Mr. Gautam Sarwar and Ms. Chand Bee, Advs. with petitioner in person versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for State with Ms. Upasana Bakshi and Ms. Divya Bakshi, Advocates R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R % 07.09.2026 1. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.118/2026 dated 23.04.2026 registered at PS: D.B.G. Road under Sections 281/125(B) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) and all proceedings emanating therefrom as the petitioner and respondent no.2 have mutually settled all their disputes vide Mutual Settlement Agreement dated 04.08.2026 (Annexure P9). 2. Issue notice. 3. Learned APP for the State accepts notice and submits that he has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2026 at 11:31:22 4. Respondent no.2 also accepts notice and submits that the he has no objection if the present petition is allowed. 5. This Court has further had the occasion of interacting with the petitioner as well as the respondent no.2, who all are present in Court. They affirm the terms of the aforesaid Mutual Settlement Agreement dated 04.08.2026 whereby the parties have agreed to put a quietus to their disputes. Respondent no.2 hence submits that he does not wish to continue with the aforesaid FIR against the petitioner. 6. The petitioner and the respondent no.2, present in Court, as well as their credentials, as on record, have been duly identified by the IO. 7. As noted above, a settlement based on mutual terms between the petitioner and the respondent no.2 is the basis of filing the present petition, which is accompanied by their respective affidavit(s) qua the said effect. In view thereof, the present is a fit case for quashing the aforesaid FIR. Accordingly, as also following the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Jitendra Raghuvanshi & Ors. vs. Babita Raguvanshi & Anr.: (2013) 4 SCC 58, Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr.: (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr.: (2014) 6 SCC 466, and also since there is nothing left to corroborate and prove the case of the prosecution, continuation of the present FIR will be an exercise in futility. 8. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and FIR No.118/2026 dated 23.04.2026 registered at PS: D.B.G. Road under Sections 281/125(B) BNS and all proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2026 at 11:31:22 9. As such, the present petition alongwith the pending application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. SAURABH BANERJEE, J. SEPTEMBER 07, 2026/bh This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2026 at 11:31:22