Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17603 (PNJ)

MUNICIPAL COUNCILOR RAJPURA v. PEPSU TOWNSHIP DEVELOPMENT BOARD RAJPURA

RSA/4796/2012 · 2026-05-07

Pankaj Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[315] Municipal C Executive District Pat Pepsu Tow Coram : Present: PANKAJ J [1] Conciliatio dated 09.04 [2] of the settle aside. [3] [4] disposed of 07.05.2026 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA RSA-4796 Date of De icipal Council, Rajpura through its utive Officer, Tehsil Rajura, ict Patiala. Versus u Township Development Board, Rajp HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA Mr. Vishwajit Bedi, Advocate for the appellant. None for the respondent. **** KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) As per the report receive iliation Centre, the parties have settled 09.04.2026 is accompanying the repo In view of the above, the pres e settlement. Judgment and decree pa Settlement be made part of dec All pending miscellaneous ed off. .2026 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable T OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH 4796-2012 (O&M) of Decision : 07.05.2026 …Appellant , Rajpura ….Respondent PANKAJ JAIN ocate eceived from the Mediation and settled the dispute. Settlement Deed e report. e present appeal is allowed in terms ree passed by the Courts below is set of decree. eous application(s), if any, stands (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No and Deed terms set tands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.05.08 18:37 I agree to specified portions of this document