Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17602 (JHR)

GURU TUDU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3226/2026 · 2026-06-24

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:18417 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 3226 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3226 of 2026 Guru Tudu, aged about 45 years, S/o Late Bara Bawna Tudu, R/o Petkhasa, P.O. & P.S. Barhait, District- Sahibganj … Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Pratiush Lala, Advocate For the State : Ms. Kumari Rashmi, A.P.P. ----- 02/24.06.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Barhait P.S. Case No.75/2025, registered for the offence under Sections 189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 117(2), 121(1), 121(2), 132, 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the Court of the learned S.D.J.M., Sahibganj. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that there are 3 named accused and 100 unknown persons in the alleged occurrence. He further submits that the allegations are made that one lady was surrounded by them and they were trying to kill her. He also submits that 3 named accused persons started altercation with the police. He next submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and so far as the petitioner is concerned, there is general and omnibus allegation against him. He then submits that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent, as disclosed in paragraph 15 of this application. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of surrounding a lady, who was mentally ill and in view of that, the prayer for anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. ( 2026:JHHC:18417 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 3226 of 2026 5. In the FIR itself, it has been alleged that 3 named accused and 100 unknown persons were present on the spot. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. There are general and omnibus allegations against 100 unnamed persons. Further, the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent, as disclosed in paragraph 15 of this application. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender, he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Sahibganj in connection with Barhait P.S. Case No.75/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 24th June, 2026 Ajay/