Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17600 (JHR)

BHARAT RAM SAHU ALIAS VISHNU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5482/2026 · 2026-06-22

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:18166 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5482 of 2026 ------ Bharat Ram Sahu @ Vishnu, aged about 20 years, son of Itwari Sahu, resident of H. No. 54, Old DS Flat Cable Town, P.O. and P.S. –Golmuri, District –East Singhbhum. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. J.N. Upadhyay, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 22.06.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with S.T. Case No. 177 of 2026 arising out of Golmuri P.S. Case No.141 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 103(1), 61(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed the murder of Ajay Basa. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the direct allegation of committing the murder of Ajay Basa is upon the co- accused Sandeep Prasad. It is next submitted that another co- accused –Shubham Prasad @ Pradeep Prasad has been admitted to bail by a coordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 18.03.2026 in B.A. No. 2155 of 2026. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he has been in custody since 01.10.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 25 of the bail application. It is next submitted that though charge sheet has been submitted in this case but no witnesses has been examined so far. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur, in connection with S.T. Case No. 177 of 2026 arising out of Golmuri P.S. Case No.141 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 22.06.2026 Sonu/