324-CA-2158-14.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 324 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2158 OF 2014 IN FAST/646/2014 The State Of Maharashtra VERSUS Deubai Shetiba Bhosale And Others …… Mr. A. M. Phule, AGP for Appellant-State …… CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 06 OCTOBER, 2026 PER COURT : ORDER IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2158 OF 2014 : 1. The present Civil Application is filed by the State for condonation of 896 days delay caused in filing the First Appeal. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the Civil Application deserves to be allowed. The Civil Application is allowed. The delay of 896 days caused in preferring the First Appeal stand condoned. ORDER IN FIRST APPEALS (STAMP) NO. 646 OF 2014: 3. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant/State. 4. By this appeal, the Appellant-State assail the impugned Judgment and award dated 18.01.2011 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar, in L.A.R. No. 239 of 1992. 5. Learned AGP for the appellant-State submits that the compensation enhanced by the learned Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. 2026:BHC-AUG:47216 324-CA-2158-14.odt 2 6. In view of the aforesaid submissions and having regard to the policy decision of the State Government contained in Government Resolution No. Sankirna-2014 / Prak.Kra.4 / Bham-1 /A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times. 7. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned order. Hence, the present Appeal is dismissed. 8. The Claimant is at liberty to withdraw the amount deposited by the State/acquiring body before the learned Reference Court, if any. 9. In view of dismissal of the Appeal, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly. [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ] JUDGE S P Rane