101 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** COCP-715-2026 Date of decision : 24.04.2026 Rajan ... Petitioner Versus Tejveer Singh and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr.Surinder Jaipal, Advocate for Mr. Supinder Singh Sohi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab for respondents no.1 to 3. Mr.Saksham Khunger, Advocate, Mr. Sandeep Khunger, Advocate and Ms. Sanju Wadhwa, Advocate with Mr.Chetan Sharma, respondent no.4 in person. VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that against the judgment dated 31.10.2025 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, the respondents have filed LPA-722-2026 which has been allowed and the judgment of the learned Single Judge has been set aside. In support of the said statement, an affidavit dated 23.04.2026 has been filed, which is taken on record. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in view of the same, the present petition be disposed of but liberty be granted to revive the same in case there is any factual error made in the statement on behalf of the respondents. 3. In view of the above, the present contempt petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE April 24, 2026. Davinder Kumar Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.04.24 12:51 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment