RAKESH KUMAR PANDEY AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/17958/2026 · 2026-05-06
Manish Kumar Nigam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1760 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1760 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17958 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties, learned Standing Counsel for State- respondents and perused the record.
2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer:
"issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 22.4.2026 respondent no.3 and the report dated 18.3.2026 submitted by concerned Revenue Inspector."
3. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing appeal against the order impugned.
4. Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy, I am not inclined to entertain the instant petition.
5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as available to him under law.
6. Certified copy of the orders, if any, be returned to learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining photo copy of the same. May 7, 2026 Ved Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Awadhesh Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pradeep Singh (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Rakesh Kumar Pandey And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad