Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17595 (KAR)

SRI SURESH v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/19430/2024 · 2026-03-12

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14827 WP No. 19430 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 19430 OF 2024 (SC-ST) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. SURESH S/O LATE MARIYAPPA AND LATE KRISHNAMMA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 2. SRI. RAVI S/O LATE MARIYAPPA AND LATE KRISHNAMMA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 3. SMT. SHARADA D/O LATE MUNITHAYAMMA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 4. SRI PRASHANTH S/O LATE MUNITHAYAMMA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, PETITIONER NO.1 AND 4 R/AT JAKKUR VILLAGE AND POST, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK – 560 064. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SRINIVASA REDDY R.V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14827 WP No. 19430 of 2024 REP BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT BENGALURU – 560 009. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB DIVISION, BENGALURU – 560 001. 4. SMT. MUNITHYAMMA W/O SAMPANNA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS 5. SMT. MUNITHYAMMA @ RATHNAMMA D/O SAMPANNA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS RESPONDENT NO. 4 AND 5 ARE R/AT ANANTHAPURA VILLAGE, SINGANAYAKANAHALLI POST, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK – 560 064 6. SRI. ANJINAPPA @ PATALAPPA S/O PUTTAIAH AGED ABOUT YEARS R/AT JAKKUR VILLAGE AND POST YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU – 560 064. 7. SRI. J. DEVARAJA S/O J. JAYARAM AGED ABOUT YEARS R/AT JAKKUR VILLAGE AND POST YELAHANKA HOBLI, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14827 WP No. 19430 of 2024 BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU - 560064. 8. SRI. R.VENKATESH S/O LATE SRI M.E. RAMANNA AGED ABOUT YEARS R/AT NO. 59, KMC PALACE ROAD VASANTHNAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 001. 9. SMT. PUSHPA JAIN W/O LATE L P JAIN AGED ABOUT YEARS R/AT NO.17/1, ALI AAKSAR ROAD BENGALURU - 650001 10. M/S SUNRAISE REALITY AND LISHER PVT LTD R/AT NO.1 AND 18, SHANKARA HOUSE, RAJ MAHAL VILAS EXTENSION, MEKARI CIRCLE, BENGALURU – 560 080 REP BY PRASADA R DESHAPANDE A COMPANY INCORPORATE UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956. 11. I T C LTD OFFICE AT NO.37 JAWAHARLAL ROAD KOLKATA – 700 071 REP BY PRASADA R DESHAPANDE A COMPANY INCORPORATE UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956. 12. HARISHAD J PARIKA S/O J C PARIKA AGED ABOUT YEARS ENTERPRISES DEVELOPERS R/AT NO.116, 7TH CROSS 9TH MAIN ROAD, R.V.M EXTENSION, - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14827 WP No. 19430 of 2024 BENGALURU – 560 090. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.V.SESHU, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. SHAM BARDWAJ FOR SRI.K.R.KRISHNAMURTHY ADVOCATES FOR R12; MISS. MARSHA GONEAS FOR SRI. GEORGE JOSEPH ADVOCATES FOR R11; R8, R9 SERVED) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 24.04.24 VIDE ANNEXURE-R PASSED BY THE R2 IN PTCL (APPEAL) 31/22-23 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER The petitioners and learned counsel for petitioners have filed a memo stating that the petitioners have amicably settled the matter with respondent No.12 and they are reporting a compromise petition before the learned Addl. City Civil Judge in O.S.No.1359 of 2015. The petitioners therefore do not wish to prosecute this writ petition. 2. The memo is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14827 WP No. 19430 of 2024 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 4. At this juncture, learned counsel for petitioners submits that if for any reason the compromise petition is not filed or is not accepted by the court, the petitioners may be granted liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action. 5. The submission of the learned counsel for petitioners is placed on record. Liberty is reserved to the petitioners accordingly. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KLY