SHIVAM UDAYKANT ANDEKAR AND ANR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
ABA/2317/2025 · 2026-10-12
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17592 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17592 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
22-ABA-2317-2025.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2317 OF 2025 Shivam Udaykant Andekar & Ors. …Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra …Respondent Mr. Chinmay Godse i/b Ayush Pasbola, for the Applicant. Ms. M. R. Tidke, APP, for the Respondent-State. PSI Balaji Pawane, Samarth Police Station, Pune City, present. CORAM:
MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED:
12 OCTOBER 2026 PC:-
1. At the outset, Ms. Tidke, learned APP, for the Respondent- State, states that there are five criminal antecedents against the Applicant and the same have not been disclosed in the Anticipatory Bail Application.
2. In view of the said contention raised by learned APP, Mr. Godse, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant, seeks withdrawal of the Anticipatory Bail Application with liberty to file a fresh Anticipatory Bail Application. However, he submits that a learned Single Judge has protected the Applicant by Order dated 20th August 2025 and that the said protection be continued for a period of two weeks. Page 1 Arjun
22-ABA-2317-2025.DOC
3. Accordingly, the Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such with liberty to file a fresh Anticipatory Bail Application.
4. No coercive steps be taken against the Applicant for a period of two weeks from today.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Page 2 Arjun