C/FA/2957/2026 ORDER DATED: 09/07/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 2957 of 2026 ========================================================== DEVSHIBHAI GORDHANBHAI Versus SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER & ANR. ========================================================== Appearance: MR KRUSHNAKANT D PATEL(10632) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MR TEJAS P SATTA(3149) for the Appellant(s) No. 1 MS DHARITRI PANCHOLI, AGP for the Defendant(s) No. 1,2 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J. C. DOSHI Date : 09/07/2026 ORDER 1. With consent of learned advocates for both the sides, the appeal is taken up for final hearing at admission stage on the ground that judgment and order passed in First Appeal No.4084 of 2021 and allied matters covers the issue herein. 2. The appeal is filed challenging the judgment and order passed by learned Principal Senior civil Judge, Dhoraji in Land Reference Case No.93 of 2009, whereby, learned Reference Court by common judgment has been pleased to dismiss the reference applications on the ground that claimant did not remain present before the learned Reference Court. Other appeals arising from common judgment has been disposed of by Co-ordinate Bench on 26.07.2022 passed in First appeal No.4084 of 2021 and allied matters. In para 6 to 8, Co-ordinate Bench has observed as under :- “6. A bare perusal of the impugned order reveals that while the learned Reference Court has referred to the evidence on record, there is no adjudication of the said evidence while C/FA/2957/2026 ORDER DATED: 09/07/2026 coming to the conclusion that the claimants have failed to prove their case and the amount of compensation awarded is inadequate and unreasonable. There is no proper adjudication done by the learned Land Reference Court to come to the conclusion and that no cogent reasons are assigned for the same. 7. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of State of Gujarat and ors. vs. Rama Rana and ors. [(1997) 2 SCC 693] has held that it is the duty of the learned Reference Court to evaluate the evidence objectively and dispassionately to reach the finding on just and appropriate compensation. 8. Further in view of the statement of the learned advocate for the claimants that no written arguments could be placed on record and no oral arguments were also made in the matter, in the interest of justice the impugned judgment and orders in respect of the LARs in question are set aside and the matters are remanded back to the learned Reference Court for fresh adjudication on merits after giving the due opportunity of hearing to the learned advocate for the claimants. Both the parties are at liberty to adduce any additional evidence in support of their cases, however, such an opportunity will be only given once. Thereafter, the learned reference Court will decide the matters on its own merits taking into consideration the documentary and oral evidence on record as well as the additional evidence which may be brought on record by the parties.” 3. Adopting the above reasons, I allow the present appeal. Impugned judgment and order is quashed and set aside and matter is remanded back to learned Reference Court for fresh adjudication on merits, after giving opportunity of hearing to both parties. The parties are directed to remain present before the learned Reference Court on 03.08.2026. (J. C. DOSHI,J) SATISH Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: SATISH CHANDRAMOHAN VEMULLA(HC00206), Principal Pvt Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 09/07/2026 16:23:25