Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:10516
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 899 of 2024 1 - Jagdish Uraon S/o Kailash, Aged About 28 Years R/o Village- Itrki, Post Barikhaf, P.S. Bhalumart, District Latehar, Jharkhand. ----(Driver Of Vehicle No. Cg 14 A 3191) (Non-Applicant) 2 - Smt. Priyambda Singh Judev W/o Late Shri Shatrunjay Singh Judev, Aged About 47 Years R/o Vijay Bihar Place, Jashpur, District Jashpur (C.G.) ----(Owner Of Vehicle No. Cg 14 A 3191) (Non-Applicant)
... Appellant(s) versus 1 - Bijendra Lal S/o Hiralal, Aged About 62 Years (Father) Caste- Uraon, R/o Ward No. 1, Shivpur, Charcha, Tahsil Baikunthpur, District Koriya (C.G.) -----(Applicant) 2 - Kaleshwari Bai W/o Bijendra Lal, Aged About 60 Years (Mother) Caste- Uraon, R/o Ward No. 1, Shivpur, Charcha, Tahsil Baikunthpur, District Koriya (C.G.) ----- (Applicant) 3 - Saroj Kumar S/o Bijendra, Aged About 25 Years (Brother) Caste- Uraon, R/o Ward No. 1, Shivpur, Charcha, Tahsil Baikunthpur, District Koriya (C.G.) ----- (Applicant)
... Respondent(s) For Appellant(s) : None. For Respondents No.1 to 3 : Shri Armaan Memon, Advocate holding the brief of Shri Syed Majid Ali, Advocate. NIRMALA RAO
2 Hon'ble Shri Justice
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Order on Board 28.02.2026
1. This appeal is listed on default.
2. No one appears on behalf of the appellant when the case is called out for hearing in the second round.
3. As the appellant could not rectify the defects pointed out by the Registry and further, there is no representation on his behalf, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.
4. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge Nimmi