SUJEET SAW @ SUJIT KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./3202/2026 · 2026-06-22
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17586 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17586 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:18142 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 3202 of 2026
------
1. Sujeet Saw @ Sujit Kumar, son of Raghu Saw, aged about 23 years
2. Raghu Saw, son of Jayram Saw, aged about 45 years Both are resident of Village Hathuadharan (Jarga), P.S. Jhumri Telaiya, P.O. Gujhandi, District Koderma .... .... …. Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioners
: Mr. Diwakar Jha, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, A.P.P.
------
02/22.06.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No. 92 of 2026, registered for the offence under Sections 272, 274, 275 and 292 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 47(a)(f) of the Excise Act, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that only on suspicion, the name of the petitioners have been inserted in the case and the alleged Mahua liquor has been recovered from a place which was nearby of the house of the petitioner and he submits that the petitioner has nothing to do with the said Mahua liquor. He also submits that the petitioners are having no criminal antecedent as disclosed in para 16 of the petition.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the name of the petitioner has come on suspicion.
5. Considering that the name of the petitioners have come on suspicion and even Mahua liquor is not recovered from the house of the petitioners and further the petitioners are having no criminal antecedent as disclosed in para 16 of the petition, in the attending facts and circumstances, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within two weeks from today and in the
2026:JHHC:18142 event of their arrest or surrender, they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma, in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No. 92 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Anit Uploaded 23.06.2026