2026:JHHC:18132 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3201 of 2026 ------ Chunu Hansda, aged about 25 years, son of Mangal Hansda, resident of Sukna Basti, Baliguma, P.O. Mango, P.S. MGM, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner : Mr. D.K. Karmakar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Arup Kumar Dey, A.P.P. ------ 02/22.06.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with MGM P.S. Case No. 193 of 2025, registered for the offence under Section 303(2) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case and the name of the petitioner has come only on confession and even the motorcycle has been recovered on the confession made by one Supriyo Ghosh and on the confessional statement of Supriyo Ghosh, the recovery of motorcycle has been made from the possession of that person. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the petitioner happens to be associates of Supriyo Ghosh and further the petitioner is having two criminal antecedents of identical nature. On these grounds, he submits that the anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. Considering that the name of the petitioner has come on the confession of Supriyo Ghosh and the motorcycle in question has been recovered from his possession however, he has taken the name of this petitioner and further the petitioner is having two criminal antecedents of identical nature, prima facie, it suggest the petitioner is associates of Supriyo Ghosh, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby, rejected. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 22.06.2026 Anit Uploaded 23.06.2026