1 2026:CGHC:10168 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 91 of 2020 Shatruhan Prasad Verma S/o Late Shri S.L. Verma Aged About 53 Years Occupation- Service, Working As Deputy Commissioner (Development) Office Of Development Commissioner, State Rural Livelihood Mission (Srlm), Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 492002., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission Shankar Nagar Road, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Additional Development Commissioner Office Of Development Commission, Indravati Bhawan, Head Of Department Building, Block-A, First Floor, Room No. 43 (Civ) Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Shri Santosh Singh Thakur Joint Commissioner, Rajya Swachhha Bharat Mission (Rural), Neer Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Shri Rajkishore Jha Joint Commissioner / Joint Director Of Panchayat Chhattisgarh 36. C- Iii Block- 2, Ii Nd Floor, Indravati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Shri Chhedilal Kashyap Joint Commissioner / Principal Panchayat Training Centre, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Shweta Mishra, Advocate. For State : Mr. Krishna Gopal Yadav, Dy. Govt. Advocate. For Resp. No. 2 : Mr. Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate. For Resp. No. 4 : Mr. Syed Majid Ali, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 27/02 /2026 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for respondent No. 4 would submit that after filing of instant writ petition in the year 2020, the petitioner has already been promoted as Commissioner vide order dated 30.12.2022 ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Date: 2026.02.27 12:35:39 +0530 2 and subsequently, he applied for voluntary retirement which has been accepted vide order dated 24.02.2025 w.e.f. 28.02.2025. As such, the grievance raised by the petitioner in this petition has already been redressed and the petition has been infructuous. To substantiate his submission, he has submitted copy of order dated 30.12.2022 & 24.02.2025. 2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for respondent No. 4, this petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. 3. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file afresh petition if his grievance still survives. 4. The copy of order dated 30.12.2022 & 24.02.2025 submitted by learned counsel for respondent No. 4 are taken on record. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arun