MOOL CHAND S/O SHRI FATEH CHAND v. RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
CW/6742/2020 · 2026-01-28
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17580 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17580 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:3949] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6742/2020 Mool Chand S/o Shri Fateh Chand, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Village Jatwali, Post Churi, Ajitgarh, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu, (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Its Chairman-Cum-Managing Director, Chomu House, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
2. The Executive Director (Traffic), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Headquarter, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
3. The Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Jhunjhunu Depot, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Palak for Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Deven Sharma for Mr. Tarun Kumar Verma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 28/01/2026
1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer:- The impugned inaction of the respondents whereby the petitioner has been deprived to get the benefit of regular pay scale as well as the benefit of selection scale on completion of 9, 18 and 27 years of service w.e.f. his date of initial appointment on the post of Driver may kindly be held as illegal arbitrary and further the respondents be directed to grant the benefit of regular pay scale as well as the
[2026:RJ-JP:3949] (2 of 3) [CW-6742/2020] benefit of selection scale on completion of 9, 18 and 27 years of service from the date of his initial appointment with all consequential benefit;
2.
Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 02.12.2021 in D.B. Spl. Appeal Writ No.524/2018 titled as The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Anr. Vs. Tara Chand submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid
order.
3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for parties and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed in light of The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Anr. Vs. Tara Chand (supra) passed by this Court.
4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Anr. Vs. Tara Chand (supra) but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If
[2026:RJ-JP:3949] (3 of 3) [CW-6742/2020] the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
5. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be extended.
6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /93