Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1758 (RAJ)

TARIF SON OF CHAKMAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3945/2026 · 2026-03-13

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:10678] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3945/2026 Tarif Son Of Chakmal, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Dudawal, Police Station Nagar, District Deeg ( At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 13/03/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.197/2024 registered at Police Station Nagar, District Deeg for offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(5), 303(2), 61(2)(a) and 313 of BNS, 2023 and Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the name of the petitioner does not find mention in the FIR. The persons named in the FIR, namely Aadil Khan, Juned and Robdeen, have already been enlarged on bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 07.11.2024 and co-accused- Bacchusingh has been enlarged on bail by Coordinate Bench of [2026:RJ-JP:10678] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3945/2026] this Court on 12.03.2025. The case of the present petitioner stands on a better footing. Petitioner is behind the bars since 12.02.2026 with any criminal past. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, accordingly on the ground of parity, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposes the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Tarif Son Of Chakmal, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/62