VEENA KUMARI AND ANOTHER v. UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND ANOTHER
CRM(M)/708/2026 · 2026-07-14
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1758 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1758 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No.708/2026
Veena Kumari and another …..Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through: Mr. Parteek Padha, Advocate Vs
Union Territory of J&K and another
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Shazia Asaf, Assisting Counsel to Mr. Pawan Dev Singh, Dy. AG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 14.07.2026
1. After arguing for a while, when confronted with the maintainability of the instant petition, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to file fresh petition. His statement is taken on record.
2. In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn along with all connected application(s), with liberty as prayed for.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu 14.07.2026 Shammi
Sr. No. 199