Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1758 (JK)

VEENA KUMARI AND ANOTHER v. UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND ANOTHER

CRM(M)/708/2026 · 2026-07-14

Wasim Sadiq Nargal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CRM(M) No.708/2026 Veena Kumari and another …..Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Parteek Padha, Advocate Vs Union Territory of J&K and another .…. Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Shazia Asaf, Assisting Counsel to Mr. Pawan Dev Singh, Dy. AG Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 14.07.2026 1. After arguing for a while, when confronted with the maintainability of the instant petition, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to file fresh petition. His statement is taken on record. 2. In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn along with all connected application(s), with liberty as prayed for. (Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu 14.07.2026 Shammi Sr. No. 199