Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5228 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
1. Heard.
2. In view of the order, which is being proposed to be passed today, notices are not being issued to the respondents.
3. The solitary relief claimed in the present writ petition for a writ, order or direction to decide the Civil Suit No. 303 of 2014 pending before Civil Judge (Junior Division)/F.T.C. II Chandauli (Mangla Yadav Vs. Ramkrit Yadav), within stipulated time, as may deem fit and proper by this Hon'ble Court.
4. Learned counsel prayed that the said suit may be decided, expeditiously.
5. Since the above-mentioned case is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
6. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to decide the Civil Suit No. 303 of 2014 pending before Civil Judge (Junior Division)/F.T.C. II Chandauli (Mangla Yadav Vs. Ramkrit Yadav), in accordance with law, expeditiously, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties as well as giving a reasonable opportunity of leading evidence in respect of their case, provided there is no other legal impediment. May 18, 2026 Ashu Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kukmar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Vikas Budhwar,J.) Meera Devi .....Petitioner(s) Rajendra Yadav .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad