MR ROSHAN THAKUR v. STATE BY EAST CEN CRIME (CYBER CRIME BANGALORE )
CRL.P/5164/2023 · 2026-02-23
M Nagaprasanna
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17576 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17576 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11791 CRL.P No. 5164 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5164 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
1.
MR ROSHAN THAKUR AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.
S/O SHRI. SHOBHIT THAKUR, R/O NO A-284, 3RD FLOOR, DEEP VIHAR, PANSALI, NEXT TO SECTOR - 24, ROHINI, DELHI - 110 042
2.
MR HANSRAJ AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS S/O SHRI BHAG CHAND R/O J- 3RD 341, JJ COLONY WAJRIPUR, DELHI - 110052 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SUKUMARAN G., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE BY EAST CEN CRIME (CYBER CRIME BANGALORE ) BANGALORE CITY, BANGALORE
Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11791 CRL.P No. 5164 of 2023
REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001
2.
DR MAHALAKSHMI ATREYI D/O S PARAMESWARAN AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS R/O B 302, SUNANDA RESIDENCY, 39/24, DOMLUR LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 071 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.N. JAGADEESH, ADDL. SPP FOR R1 R2 IS SERVED)
THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CR.NO.92/2022 DATED 24.02.2022 P/U/S 66(C) AND (D) OF THE I.T. ACT AND R/W SEC.420 R/W 34 OF IPC FILED BY THE EAST CEN CRIME (CYBER CRIME BENGALURU) P.S. BENGALURU PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE 1ST A.C.M.M COURT AT BENGALURU CITY AS PER THIS PETITIONER NO.1 AND 2 ARE CONCERNED.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11791 CRL.P No. 5164 of 2023
ORAL ORDER
The learned Addl. SPP submits that the investigation by the police has ended in a 'C' report.
2. In that light, the petition stands disposed deserving liberty to the petitioner to knock at the doors of this Court in the event of any oppose.
3. With the aforesaid observations, the petition stands
disposed.
4. In view of disposal of the petition, pending application does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the same is disposed of.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
JS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 230