Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17575 (KAR)

SRI. CHIKKANNA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/6131/2024 · 2026-02-23

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11115 WP No. 6131 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 6131 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. CHIKKANNA S/O LATE THIMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT NO. 134, SRINIVASA LAYOUT, 4TH MAIN ROAD, JAKKASANDRA COLONY, KASABA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA, BANGALORE RURAL - 562 123. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJESHA SHETTIGARA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S. BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU - 560 009. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPURA SUB DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11115 WP No. 6131 of 2024 BANGALORE RURAL - 561 203. 4. THE TAHSILDAR OFFICE OF ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPURA SUB DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA BANGALORE RURAL - 561 203. 5. SMT. NAGAMMA W/O NARASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT GIRIYANPALYA, SOMPURA BOLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 111 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS FROM R-3 RA(N)/222/2022, PROCEEDINGS INITIATED AGAINST THE PETITIONERS AS PER ANNX-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition as the prayer made in the writ petition has become infructuous. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11115 WP No. 6131 of 2024 2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17