[2026:RJ-JP:3245] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6347/2022 Panchayat Shree Digambar Jain Mandir Parshwanath Ji (Soniyan), Registered Society, Chaukdi Ramchandra Ji, Khwas Ji Ka Rasta, Jaipur, Through Its Secretary Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jain S/ o Late Shri Indra Kumar Jain R/o H.no. 1018, Paano Ka Dareeba, Subhash Chauk, Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. Ravi Kumar Sharma S/o Rajendra Kumar Sharma, R/o H.no. 29-B, Chandrashekhar Aajad Colony, Bas Badanpura, Gangagopal Gate Ke Bahar, Jaipur, Rajasthan (Proprietor, Ravi Tent House) 2. 3. Surendra Kumar Sharma S/o Ramjilal Sharma, R/o H.no. 29-B, Chandrashekhar Azad Colony, Bas Badanpura, Gangagopal Gate Ke Bahar, Jaipur, Rajasthan (Erstwhile Proprietor Of Ravi Tent House) Station House Officer, Police Station, Galta Gate, Surajpol, Raghunathgarh, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302003 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prakhar Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vaibhav Pancholi with Mr. Pawan Sharma for Mr. Krishan Chander Sharma Mr. Somitra Chaturvedi with Mr. Vikash Sharma Mr. Kamlendra Singh for Ms. Suman Shekhawat HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 23/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the writ petition for some time submits that no specific relief was granted by the learned trial Court while deciding the temporary injunction application, at that point of time with regard to restraining the [2026:RJ-JP:3245] (2 of 2) [CW-6347/2022] defendant from carrying out any activity in the garb of so called license, in spite of the fact that there was no possession of the defendant. Therefore, he, prays that he may be permitted to file application under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC for modification of the temporary injunction order. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents do not seriously oppose the prayer. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to file an application under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC, which shall be decided as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law and after affording reasonable opportunity to the respondents- defendants to oppose the application and without being influenced by this order. 4. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (BIPIN GUPTA),J Sudha/28