APHC010090232026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 5096/2026 Between: 1. SHAIK JABIULLAH, S/O NOSSAM ABDUL KALAM, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O 1-201, MUBARAKPETA, SIRIVELLA, SIRVEL MANDAL, SIRVEL, NANDYAL DISTRICT -518563 (ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DISTRICT) . ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NANDYAL TOWN AND DISTRICT, (ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DIST.) 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, L-TOWN POLICE STATION, NANDYAL TOWN DISTRICT (ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DISTRICT) 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, L-TOWN POLICE STATION, NANDYAL TOWN DISTRICT (ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DISTRICT) 5. ABDUL RAHIMAN HEAD CONSTABLE, L-TOWN POLICE STATION, NANDYAL TOWN DISTRICT (ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DISTRICT) 6. SHAIK IRFAN, S/O SHAIK JAMAL BASHA, R/O H.NO. 2-55B, MULLA PETA, NANDYAL TOWN AND MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT - 518501 (ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DISTRICT) 7. SHAIK SHABBIR BASHA, S/O SHAIK MAHAMMAD HUSSAIN, R/O 2 H.NO. 26-608-2-5E, SYAM NAGAR, NANDYAL TOWN AND MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT (ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DISTRICT) 8. SHAIK KHADAR BASHA, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER R/O H.NO. 25-446-E2, SANJEEVA NAGAR, NANDYAL TOWN AND DISTRICT - 518501 (ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DISTRICT) 9. SHAIK NASIR, S/O SHAIK NOOR AHAMMED, R/O H.NO. 25-417-4, SALEEM NAGAR, NANDYAL TOWN AND DISTRICT - 518501 KURNOOL DISTRICT 10. SYED ABDUL RAZAK HUSSAINI, S/O SYED HASAN HUSSAINI, OPP. SUBHAM MASJID, SALEEM NAGAR, NANDYAL TOWN AND DISTRICT - 518501 (ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DISTRICT) 11. VAGILIBANDI SHAIK MUDHASEER RAHAMAN, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, FAROOK NAGAR, NANDYAL TOWN AND DISTRICT - 518501 (ERSTWHILE KURNOOL DISTRICT) . ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M L NEELIMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly respondents No. 4 and 5 in interfering with respect to dispute between the petitioner and respondents 6 to 11 herein and calling the Petitioner to the Police Station as illegal, arbitrary, malafide, motivated, unconstitutional and without jurisdiction….” 2. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3 3. Ms.Neelima, learned counsel for the Petitioner, submits that Respondents No.4 and 5 are interfering in the dispute between the Petitioner and Respondents No.6 to 11, and are repeatedly summoning the Petitioner to the Police Station. 4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that the police action was confined only to a preliminary enquiry on the representation received, to ascertain if any cognizable offence was made out. It is emphasized that no case was registered and the petitioners were merely requested to attend for enquiry, without any harassment or unlawful pressure. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and recording the submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the Respondent Nos.4 and 5 not to call the Petitioner to the police station henceforth. However, it is made clear that the respondent police shall be at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner in accordance with law if any case is registered against him. 6. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 05.03.2026 PRA 4 75 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 5096 of 2026 Date: 05.03.2026 RSI