$~64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010417772026 + W.P.(C) 12910/2026 & CM APPL. 59890-91/2026 ANITESH .....Petitioner Through: appearance not given. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Tanvi Nigam, SPC with Mr. Divyansh Nigam, Advocate, Mr. Ankur Tyagi, GP with SI Shrabanta Sarkar (SSB). Ms. Jhunaina Nirwan, Mr. Abhishek K. Thakur and Mr. Ankur Tyagi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA O R D E R % 07.09.2026 1. The present writ petition seeks setting aside of the show cause notice dated 22nd August, 2026, calling upon the petitioner to explain as to why the services shall not be terminated from SSB in view of the communication issued by Additional District Commissioner, Cachar, wherein it is informed to the respondent that domicile certificate, upon verification, reflect that that the petitioner is not domicile of the said place. 2. Heard. 3. The counsel for the petitioner has invited our attention to two documents, one dated 7th March, 2026 issued by the office of Deputy This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2026 at 11:54:26 Commissioner, Cachar, Silchar and second dated 12th May, 2026 issued by the District Commissioner, Cachar, which are produced as Annexure P-3 and Annexure P-4 respectively. 4. According to him, both these documents certify that he is resident of the very same place, which is disputed in the aforesaid show cause notice and as such, he would urge that the said show cause notice is liable to be quashed and set aside. 5. The learned counsel for the respondents would object to the maintainability of the petition. According to them, the same is preferred against a show cause notice and whatever grievance the petitioner intends to canvas can be looked into by the competent authority, who has issued the said show cause notice including that of the documents which are produced at Annexure P-3 and Annexure P-4. 6. Having considered the rival claims, we are of the view that the present petition can be said to be not maintainable as preferred against a show cause notice. 7. The petitioner has every right to submit his explanation to the aforesaid show cause notice, as the said show cause notice is based on concrete evidence that is referred to in paras 11 and 12 therein. It is always open for the petitioner to counter the said evidence, which is referred to in said paras of the show cause notice, by relying on the documents which are produced in the present petition as Annexure P-3 and Annexure P-4 and also by any other document which he intends to rely upon. 8. Keeping such liberty open to the petitioner, we deem it appropriate not to cause any interference in extraordinary jurisdiction. 9. The petition accordingly stands dismissed. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2026 at 11:54:26 10. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. 11. Order be uploaded on the website of this Court, forthwith. NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J AMIT SHARMA, J SEPTEMBER 7, 2026/sn/sg This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2026 at 11:54:26