SHARUKH ALIAS MD. SHARUKH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5571/2026 · 2026-06-22
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17563 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17563 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(2026:JHHC:18060) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 5571 of 2026
Sharukh @ Md. Sharukh, aged about 31 years, s/o Avrar Ali @ Md. Abrar, r/o Ward No. 20, in front of Madarsa School, Deogher, PO & PS – Deoghar, District – Deoghar. … … …Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … …Opp. Party ------
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Jitendra Pandey, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No:- 02, Dated:- 22nd June, 2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved before this Court for grant of bail in connection with Deoghar (Town) P.S. Case No. 149 of 2026, registered for the offences punishable under section 303(2) of the B.N.S.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed theft of jewellery from the shop where he was employed. It is then submitted that admittedly the petitioner was a staff of the shop and he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion. It is next submitted that no incriminating material has been recovered from possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 22 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 10.04.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 22 of the bail application and charge-sheet has already been submitted. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any
manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar, in connection with Deoghar (Town) P.S. Case No. 149 of 2026, with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated – 22.06.2026 Aditi