Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17562 (JHR)

FAIZAL ALIAS MD. SOHAIB AKHTAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3219/2026 · 2026-06-22

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:18182 --1-- A.B.A. No. 3219 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3219 of 2026 ---- Faizal @ Md. Sohaib Akhtar, aged about 25 years, son of Sattar Khan, resident of village – Dumariatand, PO – Dhanbad, PS – Dhansar, District - Dhanbad .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Shashi Kr. Verma, Advocate ---- 02/22.06.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Govindpur P.S. Case No.102 of 2026, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 308(4), 308(5), 140(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhanbad. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that a car has touched the truck bearing Registration No.HR-38X-6474 and for that the altercation took place and the person, who has taken the car of Md. Zeeshan Alam @ Jeesu, has demanded money for repairing of the said car. He further submits that allegations are also made that owner of the car has assaulted the informant by way of key of the car and the owner of the car namely Md. Zeeshan Alam @ Jeesu has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in ABA No.2923 of 2026. He then submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in 2026:JHHC:18182 --2-- A.B.A. No. 3219 of 2026 paragraph No.22 of the petition. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the petitioner was also there on the car and in view of that the anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. Considering that the allegations are there against the owner of the car of assaulting by way of key of the car and the owner of the car namely Md. Zeeshan Alam @ Jeesu has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in the aforesaid ABA and the altercation took place only due to a minor scratch on the car and the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.22 of the petition, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhanbad in connection with Govindpur P.S. Case No.102 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 22.06.2026 Sangam/