Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1756 (UTT)

SIKANDAR IQBAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/379/2026 · 2026-02-11

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:781 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS/379/2026 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J Mr. Anil K. Bisht, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. G.S. Negi, Addl. CSC for the State/ respondent no. 1. 3. Mr. Krishna Kant Joshi, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, Advocate for respondent nos. 2 to 5. 4. Petitioner has made a representation claiming benefit of Old Pension Scheme. Such representation was made on 26.11.2025. Since no decision is taken thereupon, therefore, petitioner has approached this Court. 5. Learned counsel appearing for UPCL assures that decision, if already not taken, shall be taken within eight weeks. 6. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to take decision on the representation, as per law, within eight weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J) 11.02.2026 Navin NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df006da82a1 31bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA875643AF56 D653D095C6ED9A86DAAB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2026.02.11 17:05:50 +05'30'