HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Bail App No. 92/2026 Razak Hussain …..Petitioner(s) Through: None Vs UT of J&K .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Vishal Bharti, Dy AG Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER (14.07.2026) 1. None has appeared on behalf of the respondent, however, on asking of the Court, Mr. Vishal Bharti, learned Dy AG has appeared in the instant matter. 2. Record reveals that vide order dated 18.05.2026, the petitioner was granted interim bail and the matter was directed to be listed on 14.07.2026. Today, when the matter was taken up, no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Thus, inference can be drawn that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the instant bail application. 3. Dismissed for non prosecution. 4. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU 1407.2026 Vijay S. No. 10 Vijay Kumar 2026.07.14 17.34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document